Monthly Archives: January 2017

The Most Important Place in Town

public-library

I was reminded recently how starkly the mission of the public library contrasts with that of the “membership library” near me. An article described the membership library as having the look of “a turn-of-the-20th-Century private club,” which it is since “use of the collection and reading room is restricted to current subscribers.”

The public library’s mission, on the other hand, is simply “connecting people.” All of the people in its community, that is. No paid subscription ($55 – $1,500/year for the membership library) required. For this and other reasons, a community’s public library can be its most important place. By allowing everyone to explore, interact, and imagine, public libraries do more than provide information. They build citizens.

In the Seinfeld episode, “The Library,” Jerry said, “What’s amazing to me about the library is that, here’s a place where you can go in, you take out any book you want, they just give it to you and say, ‘Bring it back when you’re done.’ It reminds me of like this pathetic friend everybody had when they were a little kid that would let you borrow any of his stuff if you would just be his friend. That’s what the library is, it’s a government-funded pathetic friend. That’s why everybody kind of bullies the library. ‘I’ll bring it back on time, I’ll bring it back late. Oh, what are you going to do? What are you going to charge me, a nickel?'”

A seemingly devastating characterization. But if you take away the smarmy, hipster snarkiness, the comedian is paying the library a massive tribute. Indeed, the public library is about going out of its way to lend things—books, movies, music, magazines—that many people couldn’t or wouldn’t acquire for themselves. And, yes, it does it on very generous terms. Pathetic? On the contrary, I consider it remarkable and an incredibly noble facet of our society.

Advertisements

Leave a comment

Filed under Lifestyle, People, Policy

Getting Better, II

getter-better-chart

It has become a recurring theme for me to dwell on the belief that, in the grand scheme, things are truly getting better. I’m now considering a previous post to be Getting Better, I and this as a second installment.

Last month, Max Roser of Vox.com shared what he considers proof that life is getting better for humanity. Listed here and depicted by the chart above is my summary of that information:

  1. Percent of people living in extreme poverty:
    • 1910 – 82%
    • 1950 – 72%
    • 2015 – < 10%
  2. Percent of people dying by age five:
    • 1900 – 36%
    • 1940 – 24%
    • 2015 – 4%
  3. Percent of people literate:
    • 1900 – 21%
    • 1950 – 36%
    • 2014 – 85%
  4. Percent of people in democracy:
    • 1900 – 12%
    • 1950 – 31%
    • 2015 – 56%

May this data affirm that our efforts—large and small—do have a positive effect and motivate us to keep on keeping on to make the world better for as many people as possible.

Leave a comment

Filed under People, Policy, Science